Support Us

Violated hopes: My struggle to report on Female Genital Cutting in Pakistan

By Hina Javed

Country: Pakistan

When sporting my journalistic hat, I tend to sniff out stories from unlikely sources, wherever they are hidden. I look out for news, dropping into places to see what is new. This time around, however, I wasn’t particularly looking for a story. I was just making small talk with a friend, who I would call Amber, sipping tea in the chilly, wintry breeze; the stillness of time hanging heavy in the thin air; the late afternoon light filtering through the branches of a tree.

Amber kept rambling about her married life and parental responsibilities, and how both were in permanent need of repairs or adjustments like an old car needs maintenance. I pretended to listen to her, albeit inattentively, all the while thinking about the most plausible excuse for not meeting a story deadline. And just at that moment, I snapped out of my reverie at the mention of the word khatna (also known as circumcision).

Suddenly, my eyes and ears were attentive, in perfect union. In that rare and curious moment, I dared to ask her if she was talking about Female Genital Cutting, a practice I thought did not exist in Pakistan. For a split second, I thought I might have violated an unwritten code of ethics. Maybe I had not phrased the question to fit the language of social architecture. It was too late now, but I still tried to rephrase the question, spitting out tiny fragments of sentences; struggling to find the right words, and dwelling on the worst possible response.

The response was startling, if not dreadful. All this while, she was complaining about her 10-year-old daughter who had recently been cut and refused to urinate for several hours. Amber was worried that her daughter would develop an infection if she held it for too long. Perhaps, for me, this was the worst part. This limbo of not knowing whether to ask more questions, given the sensitivity of the topic. But, I gave in and flooded her with queries.

If there is one thing Amber knows about me is that I listen keenly without ever coming across as judgmental. I assume it’s because of my profession. People never ask me what I think, and I never tell them what I think, because in my view that’s the way a journalist is ought to behave.

The initial conversation got me thinking. I made several attempts to talk to Amber and determine the extent of the issue. She would mostly respond in bits and pieces, leaving me more confused than ever. One day, however, she started talking more openly; justifying the practice and expressing concerns over how misunderstood her community is. It was in that fleeting moment that I knew I had plunged into murky waters. I was ready to write my next story, except I was in a state of moral anarchy.

As I investigated the matter further for my piece, I realized something important had changed. The social architecture that dismisses the inconvenient truth of FGC was changing fast, but only among the younger generation of Bohra women. Outsiders, however, were still largely unaware of the practice. These women were speaking up in numbers too big to ignore. What was holding them, however, was the horror of bringing shame to their families and a subsequent fear of revealing a reality that would rather be rationalized away.

Listening to the stories of vulnerable women gave me sleepless nights. I felt burdened with a sense of responsibility too heavy for my shoulders to carry. They had expectations too great for me to fulfill; each one of them hanging on to the hope that my story will stir up a conversation in Pakistan and possibly bring an end to this practice.

A month later, I had almost finished writing the story despite my own uncertainties and misgivings. In my limited experience as a young journalist, I had done stories on sensitive topics but nothing came close to this. To counter my persisting doubts, I had the story edited by a trusted senior colleague who showed nothing but the greatest respect for my brave efforts. I was finally starting to feel a sense of gratification; a tiny ray of hope for giving a voice to the voiceless. I was ready to put it out before the general public. However, the journey was far from over.

The path ahead was ridden with disappointment. Pakistani media organizations refused to lay a finger on the piece due to sensitivities. I was told that I had crossed the comfort zone of the general public. The article caused a stir and went through clearance after clearance; each time censoring important chunks of information and eventually being turned down.  

I was aware of my country’s heavily censored media and the difficulties journalists had to overcome to report sensitive topics. However, my experience landed me on a different playing field altogether; one that was far from level. I was now a victim of the epidemic of shameful silencing. I was among the people who were hurt, humiliated, and degraded because I had made the mistake of speaking out. I had forgotten that stirring up a conversation would dismantle the stronghold of patriarchy. I was asked to retreat and swallow my resentment, to bear up and direct my fury elsewhere. Or turn it inwards. Or stomp it out altogether.

As I sit here in silence, I feel the guilt of betraying the survivors and the fury of being betrayed by the so-called representatives. The former, a betrayal of hopes and expectations. The latter, a betrayal of attitudes. This unbearable pressure has crept into me like a blazing fire – at first slow but fast turning into an inferno. I exist in perpetual isolation and emotional turmoil. I am left to untangle the web of reasons why all my efforts backfired. I wallow in the awareness that no one will ever acknowledge the existence of an otherwise contested practice in my country. Every time I think about taking a small step in a positive direction, I am reminded of the faces of responsible individuals shut tight with lack of concern, or with apprehension that the conversation may open a gateway to a potentially dangerous territory that could affect them.

This is the first part of a series of essays by Hina Javed on her experience of reporting on FGC in Pakistan. Read the whole series here: Pakistan Journal.

 

(Hina Javed is an investigative journalist based in Pakistan, driven by the ambition of tackling difficult, often untouched topics. Her focus is on stories related to human rights, health and gender.)

 

Sahiyo participates in 2017 Hilton Humanitarian Foundation Symposium

On October 11th, Mariya was invited to take part in the 2017 Hilton Humanitarian Foundation Symposium. Mariya, along with Tostan’s founder Molly Melching, and Safe Hands for Girl's’ Jaha Dukureh, was on a panel titled “Empowering the Silent to Speak, Engaging Communities to Respond”, to discuss FGC and the work being done to end it.

To watch a recap of the event, click here.

This year’s 2017 Hilton Humanitarian Prize was presented to icddr,b. To learn more about award recipient, click here.

 

sri-lanka.jpg

Finally in the spotlight: Female Genital Cutting is getting national attention in Sri Lanka

Until a few months ago, Female Genital Cutting (FGC) in Sri Lanka was spoken about only in whispers within practicing communities and in a few news articles. Since last month, however, the issue has suddenly attracted the attention of the mainstream national media and has been the highlight of some crucial discussions among government ministers and activists.

In Sri Lanka, FGC is practiced among the Dawoodi Bohras (who call the practice Khatna or Khafz) and among the Sunni Moor and Malay communities (who call it Sunnath). While the Bohras cut the clitoral hoods of girls at the age of seven, the Moors and Malays cut baby girls when they are 40 days old. (Read more about it here.)

FGC is internationally recognised as a violation of the rights of women and children, and is illegal in several countries around the world. However, Sri Lanka — like its neighbour India — does not have a specific law against FGC/Khatna/Khafz/Sunnath.

In order to push for a law banning FGC, a group of human rights activists and lawyers have been gathering testimonies of Sri Lankan FGC survivors. These testimonies have drawn recent media attention, and were also formally submitted to the Sri Lankan Parliament Sectoral Oversight Committee in a meeting earlier this month.  

This long overdue exposure of the practice of FGC in Sri Lanka is strongly linked to the controversies around the country’s personal laws for minority communities like Muslims.

The background

The public debate about FGC has been brought about in the midst of the discussion in Parliament on reforms to the MMDA (Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act), which was enacted by the Sri Lankan Parliament in 1951. According to this website, “The origin of Sri Lankan MMDA stems from a code of law on marriage and divorce exported from Batavia (present day Indonesia) in 1770 during the Dutch rule. This law has gone through a process of codification over a period of time and is based on Sharia law and Islamic legal practices. However, the Act also includes provisions pertaining to local customs unknown to Islamic law…”

In addition, Article 16 in the Fundamental Rights chapter of the 1978 constitution of Sri Lanka enshrined MMDA and Muslim Personal Laws in Sri Lankan law through the following statement: “All written and unwritten law that existed prior to the 1978 Constitution is ‘valid and operative’.” This has been interpreted as legal validation of MMDA and Muslim Personal Laws and local customs even if they contradict, or are inconsistent with, the fundamental rights of Sri Lankan citizens. As the Sunday Observer stated in this article, “personal Laws exist to provide the minority communities the extra protection they need, but instead, they violate the fundamental rights of people in those communities.”

The MMDA reform debates have been ongoing for decades, but they recently came back into serious discussion, with the Sri Lankan government’s application to regain the GSP+ (Generalised Scheme of Preference) from the EU. This preference was taken away from Sri Lanka sometime in 2010 citing non-compliance with international Human Rights standards. One of the criteria cited by the EU to grant this preference back to SL, was to bring about reform to the MMDA; claiming it as a rights violation against women and children.

Citing these rights, many Muslim Women’s activists and lawyers urged for a ban on the practice of FGC, and gathered many testimonies from victims, which were presented to the Parliamentary Oversight Committee on Women and Gender (POCWG) set up to address the MMDA reforms.

Hope for the future

In the past two weeks, with increasing media attention on FGC in Sri Lanka, some spokespersons from the country’s Dawoodi Bohra community have responded by defending the practice. Their argument is that FGC is “just a nick” and not harmful, should not be called “mutilation”, and that it is done for personal hygiene and for religious reasons.

However, in a positive sign, a group of senior ministers in the Sri Lankan government reviewed the practice of FGC and came to an agreement that the ritual needs to be treated as a public health issue. The meeting, held last week, included the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Women and Child Affairs and the Chairperson of the National Committee on Women. The ministers indicated that they would work with the local Muslim communities and help raise awareness about the issue of Female Genital Cutting.

Sahiyo Volunteer Spotlight: Geethika Kodukula

Geethika is a graduate student of Biostatistics in Public Health at Kent State University, Kent Ohio. Originally from Hyderabad, she has been involved in social work since 2011 when she started studying Math, Stats, and Computers at St. Francis Degree College for Women. She is a dog person and endeavors to study Mental Health and suicidality among vulnerable populations. When she is not working on her research, she tries to read fiction and play video games.

 

1) When did you first get involved with Sahiyo?

 I first reached out to Sahiyo in April 2016.

 2)  What opportunities have you been involved with at Sahiyo?

I proofread and edit the newsletters, blog posts, and media reports for readability, help with sending out the newsletter, spread the word among my peers, and help maintain the Sahiyo blog.

 3)   How has your involvement impacted your life?
I am proud to be a part of this community. It’s terrific to read our volunteers’ and founders’ achievements each month. The impact that we are trying to create together empowers me and helps me fight the helplessness I feel in the face of injustice. Survivor stories each month keep me motivated to keep fighting.

 

4) What pieces of wisdom would you share with new volunteers or community members who are interested in supporting Sahiyo?

Never underestimate what you can do. Ask for help when you need it. Be brave enough to start a conversation that matters. Don’t forget to take care of yourself!

 

Working Together To Address FGC: Michigan Roundtable

On October 9th, Sahiyo, along with Equality Now, Tahirih Justice Center, and forma came together in a roundtable discussion with Michigan’s Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to engage in cross-discipline dialogue on the challenges and best practices regarding how to respond to FGC in the United States. The roundtable discussion helped attendees to increase their knowledge base on FGC, understand the medical circumstances associated with FGC, and identify strengths, gaps, and policy/law implications that could improve outcomes for children and families. Sahiyo’s Mariya helped to facilitate this initial roundtable, and continues to work with DHHS on next steps to ensure that we work to address the issue of FGC, and how to support survivors,  in a holistic manner.

 

Sahiyo’s Mariya Taher receives Survivor Activist Award

On Saturday, October 2, the Global Woman P.E.A.C.E. Foundation recognized Sahiyo Cofounder, Mariya Taher with the Survivor Activist Award at their annual 5K Walk to End FGM Charity Event in Washington DC. Mariya along with eight other deserving women and men were given Recognition Awards for the outstanding work toward ending female genital cutting and other injustices against women and girls during the pre-walk ceremony on the Washington National Mall in Washington, D.C.  

To learn more visit the Global Woman P.E.A.C.E. Foundation blog here.

 

dbwomen2-e1496409302215.jpg

ખત્ના કરાવવી કે નહીં? આપણી દીકરીઓને મોટી થવા દો અને જાતે નિર્ણય લેવા દો

લેખિકા : ઈન્સિયા
વય :
૩૪ વર્ષ
શહેર :
મુંબઈ, ભારત

હું એક જાણીતા અને સુશિક્ષિત પરિવારની સભ્ય હોવાથી મને હંમેશા કશુંક જુદું વિચારવાની તક મારા કુટુંબે આપી છે. અમારી કોમના નિયમોને ધ્યાનમાં લીધાં વિના, મારા માતાપિતા હંમેશા મને ટેકો આપતા આવ્યા છે. મને શિક્ષણ અપાયું હતું અને મારા ભાઈઓની જેવા સરખા અધિકારો અપાયા હતા. મારી વાતની કદી ઉપેક્ષા નહોતી કરાતી અને મારા અભિપ્રાયોને ધ્યાનમાં લેવાતા હતા. હું એક દીકરી હતી, પરંતુ મારી સાથે એક દીકરા જેવા વ્યવહાર કરાતો હતો. 

પણ અમારી કોમ સહેજ વધુ એકબીજાની સાથે નજીકથી સંકળાયેલી હોવાથી, મારે શું કરવું જોઈએ તે વિશે બોલવાનો દરેકને અધિકાર હતો. મારા પરિવારમાંની તમામ મહિલાઓ અમારા પર તેમના વિચારોને પ્રભાવ પાડી રહી હોવાથી, મારી વય જ્યારે સાત વર્ષની હતી ત્યારે મારી માતા સંમત થયાં હતાં કે મારે ખત્ના કરાવવી જોઈએ.

એ દિવસ મને આજે હજી પણ સ્પષ્ટપણે યાદ છે. મારી ખત્ના કરાવવા માટે મારી માતા અને માસી પુણેમાં આ મહિલાના ઘરે લઈ ગયાં હતાં. કદાચ હવે દુ:ખાવો મને યાદ નહીં આવે, પરંતુ એ દિવસનો ભય, ઉદાસીનતા અને અવિશ્ર્વાસ હજી કાયમ છે. મારી અનેક પિત્રાઈ બહેનો હજી મને પૂછે છે, ‘‘જે કંઈ બન્યું તે વિશે તું શા માટે આટલી બધી વ્યથિત છે? શું તેથી આપણે કોઈ પણ રીતે બદલાયાં છીએ?’’

હું સંમત થાઉં છું કે ખત્નાથી સેક્‌સ (જાતીય સુખ) માણવા પ્રત્યેની મારી ઇચ્છા કદાચ નહીં બદલાઈ હોય, પરંતુ આપણી માતાઓ પ્રત્યેનો મારો દૃષ્ટિકોણ બદલાયો છે. જેઓ આપણને એવું જણાવે કે આપણને બળજબરીથી કોઈ સ્પર્શ કરે, ખાસ કરીને આપણાં ગુપ્તાંગોને સ્પર્શ કરે એ ખોટું છે, પરંતુ તો પછી તેઓ જાતે એક અજાણી મહિલાની પાસે શા માટે લઈ જાય છે? જે આપણી પેન્ટ ઉતારી પાડે છે અને આપણને સ્પર્શ કરે છે? આપણી માતાઓ અને માસીઓ-કાકીઓ કેમ એવું નથી વિચારતાં કે સાત વર્ષ એવી વય નથી કે જે વયે બાળકો તેમની સાથે શું કરાઈ રહ્યું છે, તેને સમજવા કે તેનો વિરોધ કરવા પૂરતા પ્રમાણમાં સક્ષમ છે. તેમને એવી પ્રતીતિ કેમ નથી થતી કે આની આપણા પર એવી માનસીક અસર પડશે કે જે પાછળથી આપણાં માતાપિતાને તેમના નિર્ણય બદલ ખેદ દર્શાવતાં કરી મૂકશે.

બાળજન્મની વેદના મને યાદ નથી, પરંતુ મેં અનુભવેલી લાગણીઓ મને આજે પણ જેમની તેમ યાદ છે. આજની કુમળી કન્યાઓ માટે પણ આ વાત લાગુ પડે છે. પુખ્ત વયની મહિલાઓ માટે ખત્નાની પ્રથા નાબૂદ કરવી જોઈએ કે નહીં તેનો નિર્ણય હું લઈ નહીં શકું, પરંતુ કુમળી કન્યાઓની ખત્ના નહીં કરવી જોઈએ એવું મારું ચોક્કસપણે માનવું છે, બાળપણ તમારાં બાળકોને એવી ખાતરી કરાવવા માટે હોય છે કે તેઓ સુરક્ષિત છે અને તમે તેમને નહીં ડરાવો એવો તેમને વિશ્ર્વાસ હોય છે. આપણી કન્યાઓને મોટી થવા દો. તેમના શરીરમાં આપણે જે કોઈ ફેરફારો કરવા માગીએ છીએ તે વિશે તેમને માહિતગાર કરો. આપણા મઝહબ વિશે આપણાં બાળકોને આપણે કેળવીએ, નહીં કે પ્રથા-રિવાજો વડે તેમને ગભરાવીએ.

મને ખબર છે કે ઘણા લોકો મારી વાત સાથે સંમત નહીં થાય અને ભલે તેઓ અસંમતિ દર્શાવે. કારણકે હું ફક્ત મારો દૃષ્ટિકોણ રજૂ કરવા માગું છું. હું બે દીકરીઓની માતા છું. મને ખબર છે કે મારી અથવા અમારા વડીલોની માન્યતાઓને અનુસરવાની તેમને ફરજ નહીં પાડીને તેમના જીવનને હું બહેતર બનાવી શકું. હું તેમને એવી કેળવણી આપવા માગું છું કે આપણી કોમ એક એવી પ્રગતિશીલ કોમ છે, જ્યાં આપણે આત્મવિશ્ર્વાસી, શિક્ષિત મહિલાઓ છીએ, જેઓને ઉદ્યમશીલો (કામકાજમાં પાવરધા) બનવા માટે શિખવાડાયું છે અને આપણે ઇચ્છીએ છીએ એવો રસ્તો પસંદ કરવાનો અધિકાર તેઓ ધરાવે છે.

આપણી કોમમાંની દીકરીઓની તમામ માતાઓ, કૃપયા હું શું જણાવી રહી છું તે વિશે સહેજ વિચાર કરે. આપણી દીકરીઓને મોટી થવા દો અને પોતાની પસંદગીઓ કરવા દો. તેમના વતી આપણે નિર્ણયો નહીં લેવા જોઈએ.

This article was published in English on May 29, 2017. You can find the English version here.

 

CONNECT WITH US

info@sahiyo.org

U.S. #: +1 508-263-0112
U.S. MAILING ADDRESS:
45 Prospect Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139

© 2024 Sahiyo. All rights reserved | Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy